|
Canceling Christmas
At my house, Christmas has been cancelled.
That's not to say that I won't be giving gifts or listening to pop songs with a holiday bent or drinking store-bought eggnog with cheap brandy by the bucketful. Admittedly, I don't have the financial resources this year to show more than the required bare-minimum, nuclear-family generosity, but I suspect I'm not alone in this. My beef with the holiday goes deeper. It's about being weary to distraction of the drive.
Perhaps the only thing we Arizonans know how to build is the overwrought single-family home. Everything else—roads and such—must take care of themselves, preferably by way of a generation or two of fanatical tax cuts and misguided government spending. By this I mean that it is impossible to travel, these days, by car from the south of the state to its central pinelands in less than four or five hours, and that's if you're lucky. One brief fender-bender anywhere on I-10 or I-17 means you're stuck in place, your foot slipping sleepily from the clutch to the break to the gas as you inch forward through the disappearing desert, passing stucco and red-tile-roofs and big boxes at a snail's pace.
It's not that they didn't warn us that this would happen. When I was a kid growing up in Prescott in the 1980s, they were always talking about the coming megalopolis—that urban mass of homes and strip malls that would inevitably close-in around us from Prescott to the border. As a kind of consolation for the blithe, and presumably unstoppable, destruction of a fragile landscape that exists nowhere else in the world, they said we'd surely get mass transit to take the pressure off, even a bullet train from Tucson to Phoenix and beyond. I'm not proud of this, but I always felt confident that by the far off date of 2000-something, surely this fantasy train would be a reality. But then I also thought I just had a high forehead, and that my hairline would eventually cease its heedless receding.
After returning home last week from a typically surreal and frustrating drive to Sun City to visit my girlfriend's parents, I declared a no-drive policy to be in effect at least until the new year. I don't like the person I become on the road. I would much rather sit back on a train, read a book, sip some coffee, and relax. Instead, I am forced to enter a slipstream battle of will and horsepower that can only end in frustration, boredom, or death.
That means we won't be seeing my nieces and nephews this year, and everybody knows that Christmas without kids is just a day off. At least I can start drinking early.
So I was thinking about all this when I attended last week a forum at the Tucson Convention Center called "Crafting Tomorrow's Built Environment: A Community Conversation on Regional Land Use." The mayors of all the region's towns were there, including Sahuarita's Lynne Skelton, as were the Pima County Supervisors, Tucson City Council members, and everybody else who has a say in land use policy in Southern Arizona—there were even a few big-wigs from Phoenix who showed up.
The room was a sea of dark suits, red ties, sweater vests, power-skirts, and high heels. The air smelled like PowerPoint and bad coffee. While the officials spoke, everybody fiddled with their Blackberries.
Grady Gammage, Jr., son of the famous ASU president whose name graces one of Frank Lloyd Wright's more cupcake-like structures and a fellow at the Morrison Institute for Public Policy, gave a brief presentation about the so-called "Sun Corridor."
This, as you may have heard over the last year or so, is a re-branding of that old inevitable megalopolis, only now that it's called the "sun corridor" it's not so scary, I guess.
"Over the next 20 years," a handout on the corridor says, "Phoenix and Tucson will become one of the country's ten 'mega-regions,' home to more than 10 million people."
Gammage told the forum that the sun corridor will run from Chino Valley, outside Prescott, to Sierra Vista. He also made it clear that this is something that we can't avoid, so we'd better start planning for it now. My question is, why haven't we been doing so all this time? They've been talking about this supposedly coming reality for more than 30 years.
And what's the top priority for the "Sun Corridor"?
"An integrated, modern rail system in the Sun Corridor will mitigate traffic and congestion woes in the rapidly growing region. Furthermore, future development focused around commuter rail service would preserve more of the Sonoran Desert, reduce the area's contribution to global warming, and protect air quality."
It just sounds so wonderful, so progressive, so smart.
Forgive me if I'm skeptical. I've learned one or two things since the 80s.
The subsequent 10-minute speeches from the mayors and other dignitaries were less than helpful if one was looking for honest, deep talk about the future of this state. As an example of the extreme disconnection that exists between the people and their leaders here in Arizona, consider the results of a instant poll taken during the conference. When asked to vote on what single thing they thought was most important to the future of Tucson and Southern Arizona, the people said high-paying jobs. When Tucson Mayor Bob Walkup got up to speak, he said that there'd been a different consensus at the table where all the mayors were sitting. They all said water. Do they know something we don't?
Perhaps the most honest statements came from Andy Gunning, who works for the Pima Association of Governments.
In a presentation titled "The Shape of the Region Today," he admitted that something like one-third of the residents of the Tucson area have been here less than five years; that the low-paying service sector is the state's dominant economic model and will remain so for the foreseeable future; that there has been no real increase in average earnings in Arizona in the last 39 years (pretty much my entire lifetime); that we only have enough water in the Tucson basin until 2030, and that's only if the ongoing drought and climate change don't get us first; that after Pima County reaches 2 million residents, which should be accomplished some time in 2040 or thereabouts, we can't really sustain things beyond that; and that "we are going to see a lot of congestion in the future,"
He did end on a positive note though. At least, he said, "we are catching up with decades of neglect."
Merry fricken Christmas. |